Andrew Schlafly (Yes, son of that Schlafly) and some like-minded geniuses, enraged by the pomo relativism, poor spelling and liberal bias of the leftist Wikipedia, have started their own superior and truer version – Conservapedia.
It’s not doing very well.
Comments (0)
Curse you and your agile blogging fingers, Ms Balcony: you beat me to it!
Trackback
Tigtog, it should be subject to “distributed mockery” as someone on Crooked Timber put it I think. So go to it.
Might do. I agree with Pharyngula that there’s obviously a lot of people joining in to write/edit entries with the intention of mockery. I wonder if the “conversation” in the entry title above was a genuine typo or a rogue editor.
I may be wrong, but I think the distributed mockery began later than 6 January, which is when that was upated. That’s a good point, I’ll have a look and see if there’s any more information on that.
the posts by “Mrs Tilton” are a hoot – that isn’t you, is it Tigtog?
Oh thank you thank you thank you. I foresee hours and hours of fun writing God Fearing Righteous entries.
But will they have an entry on the gipper?
GoTA, there’s no result for Gipper, but “Ronald Reagan” brings up such gems as
and
According to the conservapedia, babies prevent cancer!